Adept:
> > I just meant "bad guys" as in "heretical enemy Humakti". After all it
> > doesn't take a very large difference in Humakti dogma for the swords to
> > come out.
LC:
> True that. I think the fact that Carmanian Hum'akt as written doesn't
> have Honor as an affinity is something to base heresy on. For
> Orlanthi, that honor part is cruicial.
Yes, but what does it mean on the practical level. It's not like the Heorling's can see that the carmanian have a different affinity. That's just game-mechanics detail. I assume the Carmanian's are brutal and pragmatic, without the Heorling Humakti's honour-code, but is there more?
> Personally, I don't see why torture would be unhumakti for humakti
> where honor wasn't important. Mind you, it does seem non-combat and
> they do seem to be more combat oriented. But there is the whole "you
> only see the true man when you lean him over the pit of death"
> philosphy, which I could see being humakti in a certain way.
Not a bad start...
-Adept
Powered by hypermail