>I agree, Rob, but let me wonder if *originally* the campaigns were
>designed the other way around: play borderlands (Prax) than griffin
>mountain (Balazar), since the last scenario in borderlands leads
>characters to Gonn Orta Pass and beyond that to Balazar.
>
>When in the order the Rubble and Pavis set of scenarios were placed,
>I ask? Before Borderlands?
If you look at the RQ2 versions there's no evidence that they were intended to play together at all. About the only link that existed then was the mention of Gonn Orta in both Griffin Mountain and Borderlands. I suspect the lead from the last scenario in Borderlands to Balazar was put in because GM was the only other published work at the time. The original Pavis boxed set didn't have the scenario about the Duke of Rone's townhouse which linked to Borderlands. The Big Rubble was definitely a follow on to Pavis but that was because I think they were originally designed to be a single product.
-- Donald Oddy http://www.grove.demon.co.uk/
Powered by hypermail