Me as well. About the only problems are I'll probably forget it and some of those reading may not understand it without the definition at the time.
>In Greg's mail he mentions the dropped concept of an "etheric double"
>and it strikes me that "Etheric Double" or "Etheric Part" might be
>more readily recognisable without being confused for a specific
>otherworld part (hang on - whaqt's wrong with "otherworld part" or
>"otherworld portion"?)
Etheric double makes me think of a separate being indentical to the person being referred to.
-- Donald Oddy http://www.grove.demon.co.uk/
Powered by hypermail