I was leaving the narrativist advocacy to others. Yes I like the approach (the Well of Souls was what enabled me to understand what all the theory was about). It would be nice to have more scenarios in that style but those two are the only ones I know exist.
[snip]
>It's not so much that we need to leave room for PC success or failure...
>those will happen regardless with HQ. It's that we need to make room for
>the players' choices to matter in terms of where the plot goes. At least
>for certain styles of play.
That's not true, it is possible to write scenarios where PC success or failure is irrelevant. The Sky Ship and to a lesser extent the Battle of Iceland are examples of that. Worse still the key events happen out of sight of the PCs so they don't find out what it's all about. Not that the narrator could tell them because it isn't explained.
However the intention of the thread was to encourage the writing of scenarios useful to all styles of game. Not criticise existing scenarios or advocate one style.
Incidently my main writing experience is of freeform games and that takes narrativism to an extreme. Once the game starts the GM's have little or no influence on what happens at all - they are too busy fielding queries and resolving mechanics.
-- Donald Oddy http://www.grove.demon.co.uk/
Powered by hypermail