David Scott wrote:
>
>
> The other thought is that the some of the nine attributes will be
> subsumed into the exalt keyword and only appear as specialisms as needed.
>
I think that makes much more sense. (Accompanied with the
assumption/understanding that a PC by their very nature outperforms a
mortal in such things by default unless some specific mitigating
circumstances come up.)
>
> The five groups of five abilities could be subsumed into the
> caste/element groups as keywords, however they are very varied skills
> and might be better as lists where needed.
>
Not sure what you mean here. Each caste has a subset of 5 specific
abilities to them?
>
> The crucial point for me is not upsetting the charm prerequisites as
> that will mean a lot of conversion work.
>
So the charms have trees of prerequisites? As in, you must have this
charm followed by this next charm? Are these strict paths of a single
technique becoming more and more powerful, or are they more mix and
match than that?
LC