>
> > >The fact that we refer to is as cheesecake, rather than art?
> >
> > That's not a definition that excludes cheesecake from being art.
>
> Well, if the artist points to it and calls it art, we more or less
have to
> treat it as art. You cannot EXCLUDE anything from the category:
Art. But
> if cheesecake and art are inistinguishable, why do we have separate
words?
> Clearly, our culture does recognise a distinction.
>
> > publication. But arguing that the picture of the Selvan
> > Harana cultist is not art because of the content of Big
>
> If I wanted to buy cheesecake, there is an easy and well known way
to get it
> - top shelf magazines.
> I don't buy RPG products for this purpose - strangely, I buy them
for RPG
> purposes. Being subjected to other peoples foot fetishes is not
high on my
> list of things to do when I walk in to my local RPG store.
>
>
Yes, you've made your views very clear. Beaten us over the head with
them, even.
Thank you.
Jeff