> It can. OTOH the viewpoint of believing Malkioni can also be
> proved. And no, this isn't a contradiction but simply due to
> the fact that both sides start off with different premises
> and end up with different proofs.
Hmm. I find this is making increasingly less sense to me. The above seems to make any necessity for the term atheism defunct; we are just talking about two different sets of beliefs, are we not? Seems the same as any other theism to me.
Powered by hypermail