> > I understood, from other conversationms, was that the whole point
> > about
> > their viewpoint was that it
> > could be proved?
>
> If you are a Malkioni, yes. The existance of the Invisible
> God is proved
> by Solace and by Malkion's works in the West -- hence the name.
But proof that is only accepted by the already-faithful is not proof at all
- just more faith.
>
> if you are a Brithini or (worse) a Zzaburi, Malkion was a deluded fool
> who led many people into forsaking the Right Ways into an early and
> _permanent_ death.
But - can they or can they not prove the existance of the invisible god? That was the part that I understood was provable, rather than any claims to superiority.
Powered by hypermail