Re: Advice and Comment

From: Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_...>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:12:48 +1300


At 06:18 PM 10/11/01 -0000, you wrote:

>>>Which, I have already stated, will be amended in the ILH.

>Excellent. Except Peter said that they were NOT to be in the new
>books, I had to find the out-of-print, "work-in-progress" (nice
>euphemism) Entekosiad.

I said absolutely nothing of the sort. What I said was that Orogeria was not described in the rulebook (i.e. HW:RiG) because full keywords were not given for her! This is in response to your criticism that abolsolutely nothing was said about Orogeria.

>I'm going to ignore Peter, this is not the first time we've clashed
>on this list, with him ignoring my explanations,

What explanation of yours have I ignored?

>and always resorting
>to attacks, calling me "smart-assed", "unproductive grumbler",

I called you nothing of the sort. I simply said that making smart-alec potshots and unproductive grumbling were not the best way to offer advice. Rather than distort what other people write, could you actually address what they said?

--Peter Metcalfe

Powered by hypermail