> Mikko Rintasaari wrote:
> ...
> > It seems to me that the scale is seriously off. At least by a factor of
> > 2, and propably more.
> ...
>
> Or, perhaps, 1.604 (=mile/km).
It did help a bit, if the conversion was done like that.
Unfortunately I was reading the new maps, and reading the scale as miles. It's still incredibly packed.
Somehow places like Heorland need the majesty of vastness. They shouldn't be small and crowded. =(
-Adept
Powered by hypermail