> John recommends:
>
> > I personally would not advocate drawing tribal boundaries however.
>
> Maybe include a couple of miniature "political" maps off to the side,
> showing tribal names and locations at 1600 (free/good ol' days) and 1620
> (slave/HW period), then?
>
> I'd still not want boundaries on those, though. Too much fighting to be done
> over them thar hills.
I at least would like to see tribal boundaries of some date. 1600 ST would be neat. In the history for most campains, so people don't have to feel "oppressed" when they have decided differently for their own campain present.
It would help make the place a bit more solid,
-Adept
Powered by hypermail