"Discredited" hypocrisy argument? Discredited in what way - it is one of the major tropes associetd with the Lunar empire.
> >So describe a post-mediaeval state, I would need to
> >know much more than merely the content of its dominant myth
> >- I need to know what it actually does on the ground.
>
> Since we are not talking about post-medieval states, but
> ancient societies in which the gods are real, the relevance
> of this to the topic is?
That I need to know what they do on the ground.
> No, you haven't made it clear that the material is valuable.
You are entitled to that interpretation.
> You've been complaining that the material is only applicable
> to psychology while making spurious objections to arguments
> that gloranthan myths are much more important than this.
NOT that they are more important that that one, tiny little bit.
Powered by hypermail