Re: Julian continues to blather about tacit consent

From: Graeme P. Bell <mac_logo_at_rxnZCdVHh0SuqZ-LaIsLWQqN6gT_VgHC_LGyeQTilsQHzx5vtLvlP9yUqC-ICwLLCDY>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:16:39 -0000

> --- In OpenHeroQuest_at_yahoogroups.com, Chris Lemens
<chrislemens_at_y...>
> wrote:
> > You know, I thought that explicit threats of beating
> > Julian even more senseless had some effect. Perhaps
> > not, thus proving some small part of his point:
>
> I think it is a spelling mistake. He is talking about tactile
> consent. He won't agree with you unless/until he can feel you
> beating him senseless...
More likely to be tactical consent. He only agrees _while_ being beaten. I guess that makes it pointless to stop...

Graeme