>>>Yeah, but did you recognise my source?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Nope. I recognised the style as being too lucid and coherent
>>to have come from an American lawyer, but no more.
>>
>>
>
>It's the (justly infamous) 1994 TSR online policy, with a *very* slight
>respray. (The TSR grab was a previous low point for RPG publishers'
>contempt for that thar Intarweb thingie, only matched by White Wolf
>("Hey, Net Punk!").
>
>TSR vs. the Internet archive:
>http://www.cs.ucr.edu/~jimv/debate.html
>
>Hey, Net Punk!
>http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.games.frp.misc/msg/9d721288d5f62
>8f5
>
>TSR/Wizards have come a *long* way since then, of course. But I still
>have a soft spot for their old Code of Ethics (presented here alongside
>its spiritual ancestors):
>http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/alex/rec.games.frp.dnd/TSR-Ethics
>http://www.artsreformation.com/a001/hays-code.html
>http://www.comics.dm.net/codetext.htm
>
Thanks for that Nick.
I personally like THIS ONE :
ftp://ftp.cs.pdx.edu/pub/frp/tsr/debate/freedom1.txt
cheers,
Julian
Powered by hypermail