Sounds like a Twinkie defense to me.
>
> When straight people are ostracised, legally and socially
discriminated
> against or even killed just for being straight:
Can you provide figures for the number of people who have been gaybashed by people who have read my Nandan keyword?
>
> http://www.queer-america.com/shepardmatthew.html
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3969763.stm
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/332743.stm
>
>
> Well, then I'll start being particularly worried about heterophobic
insults.
>
> So-called "humour" of the sort you peddled is part of the process
of
> marginalisation and belittlement which helps to legitimise these
sort of
> attacks. A similar process has operated with respect to racial,
> cultural, religious, etc. minorities in a multitude of times and
places.
>
An accurate portrayal of American / British society in the past, but
as I live in the gay capital of the east coast I would find it
difficult to agree with you if that if it is your interpretation of
todays society. I do not believe any amount of words is any excuse
for harming anyone gay, straight, white or green.
I guess now since I have read the Nandan keyword several times, and had a propostion by a gay guy at the Omni bus station, I will have to go over to South Beach and burn down a gay club or slash a fews gay guys lying on the beach.
Powered by hypermail