> At 12:10 AM +0000 27/6/05, Jeff Richard wrote:
> > > OK, well in that case it's a non-Gloranthan document
> written by Greg
> >and
> >> friends, many years ago, and given the number of
> Greggings that have
> >> taken place since, can be held to be generally worthless
> as a sharp
> >> instrument for HQ-era nitpickery purposes.
> >
> >Without otherwise commenting on this now ridiculous thread, I think
> >Julian is spot on with this comment.
>
> Thorough agreement. The prosopaedia remains a useful source,
> as it contains a fair few snippets not found elsewhere (mostly about
> representations), but it seems strange to rely on it as a precise
> source to settle distinctions that were much less defined at its time
> of publication.
You mean we *hadn't* been taking that for granted for years??? Even on THIS
list?