Re: Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan

From: Mark Galeotti <hia15_at_6tfRu6ETRcDItMJt4J1ELe3-EuQcbVenK7_K_EDPFXN4jxIAzYJhwYub42aqoyJCVWSnL7>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:14:55 -0000

There's a big difference between a generalised 'everyone ought to be part of our sphere of influence' PoV and a plan to conquer the world. There was lots of kerfuffle in the West about the bear reaching out his claws and all that (just as in the Eastern bloc Reagan's invasion of Grenada was characterised as the first step in an invasion of Cuba; this was the Cold War, people said and sometimes even believed all sorts of stupid things) but

  1. the main invasion force was to a large extent withdrawn 6 months after, and only then brought back up to strength as the level of resistance became clear
  2. the Sovs never had the kind and size of forces in-theatre which would be appropriate for further power-projection. In the RW, you can't just move tanks, heavy bombers, etc in, you need the logistical framework, and they never made any attempts to build them up
  3. the Sovs had a much better idea of their military weaknesses than the West. They knew they couldn't force the Fulda Gap without nukes, never mind hold the line in Europe _and_ commit to a major operation in the Middle East. If anyone knows about the dangers of a war on two fronts, it's the Russians.
  4. not a speck or scintilla of actual evidence has emerged about any Grand Plan, even after the Soviet collapse, not even in the files of the General Staff's Main Operations Directorate, whose job it was to come up with even the most unlikely contingency plans.
  5. so there!

All the best

Mark            

Powered by hypermail