Re: Glorantha Digest, Vol 12, Issue 131

From: Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_xHu_M0KtZrLQYX7syzcZ_wzyL8jFnvySm7cQarN2N16uFoTXqHL-oVlXq7940CQVvxq>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:43:28 +1200


Jane:

[transferred from Glorantha Digest]

> > No, I did not. I _disagreed_ with _your_ usage of
> > aspect, saying it was a theistic term while Malia was
> > anmist. Did you not notice my subsequent statement
> > that "What I was suggesting was that the two
> > sides of Malia were _like_ theistic aspects"?

>Yes, which appears to repeat my statement while adding
>linguistic confusiuon.

What part of the word "like" did you not understand?

>Hunting back through old, old messages - oh, not yet
>deleted, fine..

I'm not interested in going through your linguistic muddle. I did not say and your quote does not support your allegation that I said the chaotic aspect of Malia was theist.

>Those quotes that say Malia as worshipped by broo is
>chaotic - are they in-Glorantha sources, or objective?

Why don't you look it up and find out?

--Peter Metcalfe            

Powered by hypermail