Re: Ataman

From: Tim Ellis <tim_at_trABJi-Kh3AMMDHoN3G5lXkH06EQasMZM0cDV-ZQukhOyKEehqEEuYwWnHLSqnf9bVDJAqwP>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 16:21:44 -0000

A sort of more mature "Ataboy"?

>If this word catches on, my Glorantha's buggered.
>

In Greg's mail he mentions the dropped concept of an "etheric double" and it strikes me that "Etheric Double" or "Etheric Part" might be more readily recognisable without being confused for a specific otherworld part (hang on - whaqt's wrong with "otherworld part" or "otherworld portion"?)            

Powered by hypermail