RE: I couldn't think of a subject

From: Sam Elliot <samclau_at_6d6I3Qk794TLQq6EcE5BSUlaDBDOIyFCFyIKFN_cCW16dolV4GHUxd-Uav6PcXpx0aZw>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 17:34:31 -0200


> In this thread -- http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?t=181101 -- the
> man from Del MoonDesign, he say:
>
> "I don't really want Glorantha to get associated with bad porn."
>
> Cool! Is good porn okay? What about Jimbo's
> <muffled>mwuhbhies</muffled>?

Without reading the link (you shouldn't read those threads, Stu, they only make you feel superior), I reckon that the difference between good and bad porn is the quality of the 'taches (feel the width).

Just read the (end of the) thread - definitely the taches he's worried about. Imagine if every Gloranthan book had one of those handlebars on the front. Betcha Bimbo's has only good trimmed beards and the like. That makes it good porn.

For the uninitiated, when Stu says mwubhies, it's man boobs between which he is ensconsed. The extra w represents a higher level of excitement; the shorter and more aspirated vowels (uh, hies) represent a lack of oxygen. So I am led to understand.

Sam.            

Powered by hypermail