Why?
Well a devotee tends to have a god-awful relationship to their god, far higher than their relationship to the clan or tribe. As a result, he (or she, for those VInga folk), would always pick the goals of the deity over the goals of the clan. When these differ (like how many cattle to sacrifice on a holy day versus how many to sell) then they may lose the clan support that they need to keep their position.
On 6/19/07, oswaldtrimling <oswaldtrimling_at_6ZLH-WuUmkiLB3Z6k8TNH2P_8qAgezqzvuN68Hp9Y5ZlTwO_5GARyAg0mZ_tD027Ff1GGWvP9GLmFq2PYwVLmhmD.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>
> --- In ImmoderateGloranthaQuest_at_yahoogroups.com<ImmoderateGloranthaQuest%40yahoogroups.com>,
> "Darren"
> <d.staples_at_...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yes but (tm) Jeff where would the anoraks be without all the little
> > rules to smugly quote and feel superior with when they find a "loophole"
> > such as the Dar Devotee conundrum?
>
> Ooh, hark at him :)
>
> > They might have to use their
> > imaginations instead of being told what to do in the rules. Shock
> > horror! As David Scott points out, it's odd that the rules lawyers never
> > seem to quote YGWV or MGF.
>
> Actually, I did. Only in the second post, mind you, but just sayin'...
>
> To me, the idea of Kings being devotees of Dar seems obvious and
> logical. I confess that when I read HQ books and coming across
> something that makes sense to me, and is the way I expected it to be
> (say, 'Vinga is a woman'), my first reaction isn't 'hang on, that
> can't be right - Issaries wouldn't deliberately write something that
> made sense. Must be a mistake'.
>
> Perhaps this is where I'm going wrong!
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Powered by hypermail