Re: Terror in war

From: Jeff Richard <richaje_at_VegSbJqgDTx9KHny07KBQFv5Xp70au91mxYd2fLWShquqj529AedJGCPEaXlzWWB_nZr>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 07:12:31 -0000


> It may be possible to be dangerous without being religious - in much
the
> same way as its possible to be dangerous without being a red-hot poker.
> And the fact that some things can be dangerous without being red hot
> pokers, does not necessarily prove that most (or even many) red hot
> pokers are safe.

And now let's add some rabid anti-religious bigotry to the stew... Geez Mark, I'm afraid you were responding to only the tip of the iceberg on this list.

Jeff            

Powered by hypermail