RE: Re: Odlaylans [posted on wog]

From: Sam Elliot <samclau_at_aOsou1na8D11QdKZtmaBt6KphX4U2P1vokDLePmN6ds0NPXpx8YWdWvuiqwBPsHy78NS>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:10:05 -0300

Yep, I know all about that stuff. I just failed to see the difference in Phil's text. But, I had just driven for five hours on a long weekend Sunday evening through mountainous Brazilian roads, if you can imagine how much fun that is, so my brain wasn't on top form - hence the failure. Now, though, I do see what he was saying was different.

I only chipped in because people often think females aren't promiscuous at all. But it seems Phil knows that already :)

Sam.

p.s. Promiscuity isn't the only point of males - there is the doing the bulk of the driving and the taking the rubbish out stuff too, you know.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ImmoderateGloranthaQuest_at_yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:ImmoderateGloranthaQuest_at_yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of julianlord
> Sent: 11 September 2007 12:45
> To: ImmoderateGloranthaQuest_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: Odlaylans [posted on wog]
>
>
> Sam :
>
> From the POV of personal 21C Western mushy morality the difference is
> certainly blurred out of all recognition --- from a normal biological
> POV OTOH non-promiscuous females are more attractive, as there is a
> far greater chance that your stuff will produce their offspring as
> opposed to the other guy's...
>
> Males though --- well, promiscuity's the whole point of the entire
> gender, obviously...
>
> Julian
>
> > I fail to see the difference.
> > But, such is life.
> > Sam.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: ImmoderateGloranthaQuest_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > [mailto:ImmoderateGloranthaQuest_at_yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of
> Phil Hibbs
> > > Sent: 07 September 2007 06:22
> > > To: ImmoderateGloranthaQuest_at_yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: Odlaylans [posted on wog]
> > >
> > >
> > > On 07/09/2007, Sam Elliot <samclau_at_...> wrote:
> > > >FWIW, in he real world, there is selection on females for
> promiscuity.
> > >
> > > Not the *same* selection though, I chose my words with care.
> Also, I'm not
> > > averse to bending the facts to support an idea.
> > >
> > > Phil.
> > > --
> > > Don't you just hate self-referential sigs?
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > You Are All Idiots. Signed, De Immod.
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
>
> You Are All Idiots. Signed, De Immod.
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>