Yes, I'm a completist. But completists are self-motivated and don't need formalized rewards like achievements. It'd be nice to have, sure, but personally it wouldn't add anything to my enjoyment.
>
> On 31 May 2011, at 04:58, KingOfDragonPass_at_yahoogroups.com wrote:
>
> > More importantly, though - is it interesting? The way the map is filled
> > out, this would be a fairly hard achievement - and not for any good
> > reasons. Getting this achievement would be a chore, and adds nothing to
> > the gameplay.
>
>
> Apparently it is interesting for some people (e.g. "outis02") -- which is one of the factors I use for achievements (which are optional). I've never been a completist myself, but I don't see the harm in acknowledging those who are. What would definitely be bad is an achievement that most people don't care about, which is insanely hard.
>
> I'd been thinking about it and even before I read the digest this morning, decided that this should probably turn into "Orlanthi all" (which would be 85% of the map). Though landmarks should be part of it.
>
> > I can't run KoDP to run on Win7 x64 to confirm
>
> That's odd, I just ran under Win 7 over the weekend to check on something.
>
> David Dunham http://a-sharp.com Twitter: _at_KingDragonPass
>