RE: FOUNDATION: Progress of the Siege

From: Jeff Richard <richj_at_...>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:48:32 -0800

If there was a breach in the wall in early 1619, I doubt Whitewall would last until late 1621. Unless it was at a completely inaccessible point.

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Jane Williams [mailto:janewilliams20_at_...] 
	Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 11:55 PM
	To: whitewall_at_yahoogroups.com
	Subject: Re: FOUNDATION: Progress of the Siege
	
	
	Nice work, John.
	
	--- John Hughes <john.hughes_at_...> wrote: 
	


	> Lunar cavalry on the main road climbing to Whitewall

	> are waylaid by rebel ambushes. 

	
	Quack!
	


	> Despite magical ploys, **formal challenges** and the

	> slaughtering of hostages, 

	> the defenders within the city refuse to come forth

	> to give battle.

	
	With the exception of various Humakti who have the
	wrong geas.
	


	> [Speculation: Out of control, Bat destroys sections

	> of city and besieging army before flying

	southwards.]
	
	Let it destroy a chunk of the walls, then we've got a
	breach to defend.
	
	
	
	=====
	Jane Williams