Re: Kallyr and Storms

From: Alex Ferguson <abf_at_...>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 03:48:02 +0000

On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:02:07AM +0000, Jane Williams wrote:
> Makes sense, and could explain this. Especially if you
> make the change from Vangarth to Dar a little bit
> later: during 1613 rather than 1611.

Perhaps this isn't anything as over-engineered as an actual change of initiatory status. In RQ this might have been a possible case of "associate magic", likewise in HQ I think it's covered by "can learn magic without actually joining subcult". In some cases, perhaps just as a stand-alone feat.

Cheers,
Alex.