Re: Re: The BatBlat

From: Roderick and Ellen Robertson <rjremr_at_...>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 14:05:54 -0800


> the Crimson Bat??? *agile*!!!!
>
> (here you're supposed to say "Oh alright, I suppose it *does* sound a
> little preposterous!")

"Oh alright, I suppose it *does* sound a little preposterous!"

:-P

> I mean..... Agile!!?????

The whole original point was that the bat can do aerobatics well lower than 1000m - it won't "drag a wing" by tilting 2 degrees. It's wings are not fixed, they can (and do) move. It's flight pattern does (should) not resemble a B-52 or a Condor. The wings are constantly in motion, and to do any manuevers it will need to bring one (or both) wings in close to its body.

RR
It is by my order and for the good of the state that the bearer of this has done what he has done.
- Richelieu

Powered by hypermail