Re: Re: siege engines

From: Roderick and Ellen Robertson <rjremr_at_...>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:20:23 -0700


> Worse yet, from the position of the various sub-commanders is that
> Tatius the Bright appears perfectly pleased whenever the storm repulses
> a Lunar assault (which the Yanafali constantly complain are
> undermanned). In fact, I suspect that there are many Yanafali,
> Carmanians and Tarshites who increasingly think in 1620 and 1621 (until
> the very end) that Tatius should be removed for incompetence. The odd
> thing is that the Emperor himself keeps increasing the honors and
> authority of Tatius.

I assume the "why" of this has been discussed - can someone point at a general time period on the list to look it up?

RR
It is by my order and for the good of the state that the bearer of this has done what he has done.
- Richelieu

Powered by hypermail