In smaller battles (say 4 or 5 regiment size) the general would direct the
entire battle himself.
I picture the commander at his command post (perhaps a tent with a red flag like Caesar) sending staff officers with orders to regiments.
In the largest battles there might potentially be sub-commanders for each wing, the centre and reserve; I don't think there would be others. In some battles the centre (at least) might well be one long phalanx!
My instinct is that there are always regimental officers, staff officers and the overall commander; in large battles there would also be sub generals who might be drawn from the senior regimental officers present or alternatively from the most well connected staff officers.
Sent: 30 July 2004 20:21
Subject: Re: Corps and armies
Legates, surely, to handle brigade-size chunks, unless the army is one long phalanx.
That's two levels, and WB&RM implies that the Lunars have a battalion level as well; presumably most of their problems can be dealt with by a small number of battalions.
> Having said this the army commander would very likely devolve the
> of the wings in battle to subordinates (tribunes or possibly senior
> commanders?), and would maintain a general staff to reduce the
Powered by hypermail