Re: Humakt, kinship & incest

From: Osentalka <Osentalka_at_D1dE6o5G-tv8gj0KwlIGsFUbpXyzP81VsNDgKP1-GsqcCAfPL2qrA1BaXG5ULDtxSo>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:29:53 +0100

Hello Greg

Wasn´t there two Humakti warriors in your capaign that had a child with each other (the invisible one)?

I don´t see Humakti as "incapable of having children." But i see the children of a Humakti to be doomed (and the one of TWO Humakti even more)!

Cheers

André

• Original Message ----- From: "Greg Stafford" <Greg_at_zA7x0S3wSnoy2wQ48QY5zHoEOW6up_yido6ZnzQMz5A5DBaNEP4n2Rxtt0gqnQsayyABMPD-8MiFJ5V1ww.yahoo.invalid> To: <WorldofGlorantha_at_yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 1:58 PM Subject: Re: Humakt, kinship & incest

> YGWV
>
> > What I meant was: would one of the
> > couple being a humakti void the prohibition against incest.
>
> As long as the severing was complete, yes.
> The Humakti is no longer kin.
> He's dead, too, actually.
>
> And btw, that being dead part is why Humakti are incapable of having
children.
>
> ========================
> Sincerely,
> Greg Stafford
>
> Issaries, Inc.
> c/o Greg Stafford
> 1942 Channing Ave, #204
> Berkeley, CA 94704 USA
>
>