Re: proportions and so on

From: donald_at_89Fx6K7j4bik9PKMR3BC_iO2uKdazGi17xnSajL4HhdoBIaL8W87MxZ1m_PDbot4gQ-Jn
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:12:36 GMT


In message <737308.18353.qm_at_CDSoofpraK9U07Q02kpqDwZLV3YgNsjHkENZpt_-kKNVCa_zEAAGUB5tt39AvLdD5REKwIvc-5GTxaMCG4bGELgIE5SoPEqbVOJMu2WOmGHJIABD21U.yahoo.invalid> Jane Williams writes:

>Makes sense to me. Where specialist cults exist and
>there's no advantage to the less dedicated version,
>might as well go straight there. Vinga Dar, though,
>for a lot of female leaders.

That's something I don't understand, why Vinga Dar when you've got Orendana? I can see Kallyr choosing Vinga Dar because she's already Vinga but I can't see an Ernaldan choosing to join Vinga unless a particular clan is excessively patriarchal in it's choice of leaders. And if so does that mean there are clans where a man has to join Nandan Orendana to lead it?

>Maybe - as herders? I'd expect Elmali clans to have a
>lower proportion of women who want to follow male
>lifestyles anyway (at least, want it enough to buck
>social convention).

Not according to the writeup. Redaldan's don't herd horses, they treat them as people. It's not a male lifestyle but a sharing of Elmal's love of horses.

Of course this could be the "My Little Pony" interpretation of the cult.

-- 
Donald Oddy
http://www.grove.demon.co.uk/

           

Powered by hypermail