>Tales, wonderful publication that it was, is not what I would describe as
>definitive.
And you don't accept Gods of Glorantha and Cults of Terror either. So why do you complain about my interpretations?
Moreover if you don't accept Tales 8 as being definitive then what part of Krarsht strikes you as being undead?
> > Moreover if Krarsht's bite cause chaos as you think it
> > does, how is it that the bite of her Krarshtkids have no
> > such properties?
>That a servant of a god does not have all the powers of a god is no
>surprise.
Except that the Krarshtkids are meant to be spitting images of her. The feats given by her are the same things that her children can do.
--Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail