Re: Adept's questions on chaos

From: Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_Xf_aj4OWJzRh6-4gg0knueo5_Ku4m00WBKHopJVjY3AAu2M8nbqvZ2HJj3ksUGAF2qO>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:18:08 +1200


At 01:04 p.m. 19/04/2007, you wrote:
>On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Peter Metcalfe wrote:
>
> >> Gods of Glorantha Krarsht: Chaos, Undeath (I think that's the undead
> >> rune)
> >
> > In Tales 8, it's described as Hunger.

>Tales, wonderful publication that it was, is not what I would describe as
>definitive.

And you don't accept Gods of Glorantha and Cults of Terror either. So why do you complain about my interpretations?

Moreover if you don't accept Tales 8 as being definitive then what part of Krarsht strikes you as being undead?

> > Moreover if Krarsht's bite cause chaos as you think it
> > does, how is it that the bite of her Krarshtkids have no
> > such properties?

>That a servant of a god does not have all the powers of a god is no
>surprise.

Except that the Krarshtkids are meant to be spitting images of her. The feats given by her are the same things that her children can do.

--Peter Metcalfe            

Powered by hypermail