> >Saying that the borders are blurred does not imply there
> >is no objective test for chaos in glorantha. By the same
> >reasoning, one could argue that because some cancers
> >are hard to detect, cancer is not an objective concept.
>
>Doctors in the RW have a clear definition of cancer which,
>with training, anyone can apply. If we, or more importantly
>Gloranthans, haven't a definition of what a chaos feature is
>then that isn't an objective test for chaos.
But we do have an objective definition of chaos - a chaotic feature is pretty much definitive. Chaos is not a subjective phenomenon (and heaven help us if the sobjectivist debate breaks out again).
> >Except that this issue [of Chaos spreading] has been
> >addressed in the Cults of Terror.
>
>Which is of course a completely objective document, like
>everything else published about Glorantha.
And the problem with the Cults of Terror treatment is what?
--Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail