Re: Harsaltar the Terrible and the Red Emperor

From: Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_0nJpphFE4gm12qqAz8-zUbfq7oBRxakigeQi0_D-CDjQX2jCZWtvsHiTEvrhVe7LKlY>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 12:53:06 +1200


At 12:31 p.m. 2/05/2007, you wrote:
>wrote:
> >
> > ...and so Humakt struck him dead.
>
>...of course, "Humakt struck him dead" could include such options
>as "Humakt sent a disciple to kill him"--and indeed, that disciple
>could have been Harsaltar himself. That is, if Harsaltar felt his duty
>to the god compelled him to kill himself, I could see the chroniclers
>remembering it as "Humakt struck him dead".

Since Humakt is the God of Death and has been known to strike people dead for breaking an oath (cf the consequences of breaking an Oath spell in RQ), I see no reason to abjure the jehovahist imagery of being struck dead in favour of a dull mundane explanation.

--Peter Metcalfe            

Powered by hypermail