> > Vith is not and never has been a dragon. The Kralori TarnGatHa is
> > the dragon Dogsalu in Vithelan mythology. That the Kralori think
> > that Dogsalu was the first ruler only demonstrates their stupidity
> > in Vithelan eyes.
>Can you give a source for that? Or explain the reasoning
>behind.
Which looks more like the first Dragon? Dogsalu or Vith? Is there some reason why Vith has to adopt a totally alien form when his myths are full of how he is unaffected by anything?
>The idea is interesting, but I have always taken
>the Vith - TarnGatHa analogue as a given.
Except that Revealed Mythologies does not actually say this.
--Peter Metcalfe
Powered by hypermail