Re: Ho Much Rule fiddling Is Tolerable?

From: L.Castellucci <lightcastle_at_yvi9lo2QAwyn_SY8L2Yw2DCmmUuiLZcOC3Pel_Md6A8MJWA-0YsvSyUQ-N1mXZLn>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 11:57:52 -0400


See? Now that's nice. That works. I'm still not a huge fan of "augment only" because of the way I view the rules, but I can see that.

(Now, what interests me as a side note is whether or not there is "powerful" common magic. Other than concentration, is there a way to do a powerful wielder of common magic? Is that even appropriate/applicable in Glorantha?)

On July 18, 2007 03:34 pm, Ian Cooper wrote:
> BTW and add that Greg and I reviewed and it does look as though that
> the idea that less-poweful magicians tend to use magic to help them
> with tasks, whereas more powerful ones tend to use it directly is
> there, matching the way HQ treats this with its active/passive divide.
           

Powered by hypermail