Re: Ho Much Rule fiddling Is Tolerable?

From: Roderick and Ellen Robertson <rjremr_at_g9PClsuuArfFtjG9ccj2AJKicsL0oHKtsrcdG4VGZ3NO3rNkRp-zTevlAA3vbmCPeL9sf>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:39:12 -0700

And that was an "oops" (though not a *bad* one). I was actaully repsonding to someone else, and Replied to the attached message instead of the main message). But the main point stands...

RR
He was born with the gift of laughter and the sense that the world was mad R. Sabatini, Scaramouche

> This particular thread (about "differentiation between magic" I think *is*
> suitable - as (even though it's arguing HQ-isms) the three-world model is
> seen as *important* in playing in glorantha, no matter what ruleset you're
> using. But I'll make a shout-out to the lists about it.
>
> RR
> He was born with the gift of laughter and the sense that the world was mad
> R. Sabatini, Scaramouche
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Dunham
> To: WorldofGlorantha_at_yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Saturday, July 21, 2007 12:34 PM
> Subject: Re: Ho Much Rule fiddling Is Tolerable?
>
>
> Ian answers me
>
> > > would people be happy
> > > leaving Gloranthan magic without specific rules? NO fiddly bits?

etc. snipped.