> Yes, of course - why else would I have mentioned it? And, no we don't
> have a house rule about number of augments, if that's what you're
> implying. Like we both said, different groups have different styles.
That's more different than I would have expected. You're leaving augments on the table! It's hard for me to conceive of having only a +2 augment most of the time.
Do any other groups eschew augments like this? Most keywords are going to provide a number of 'em, and are usually associated with a magic keyword that provides at least one or two more.
-- David Dunham Glorantha/HQ/RQ page: www.pensee.com/dunham/glorantha.html
Powered by hypermail