That is, of course, the approach I would use as well. It simply makes good sense.
LC
On August 20, 2007 05:33 pm, Mark Galeotti wrote:
> --- In WorldofGlorantha_at_yahoogroups.com, "L.Castellucci"
>
> The key phrase is _fleshed out properly_. Someone wants to write a
> book based around penetrating Harrek's wolf pirates and freeing
> prisoners, then including a full write-up of Harrek and his stats
> might well be entirely appropriate and germane. But if, say, Jeff K
> had wanted to use the fact that there was a rumour on p50 of BOG that
> Harrek was about as an excuse to include a one-paragraph summary of
> his stats, I wouldn't have passed that because it was neither
> necessary nor a proper treatment. (That's just an example: Jeff's a
> pro and wouldn't have tried anything like this)
>
> All the best
>
> Mark
Powered by hypermail