Re: Naively looking for 'Pavic Tales'

From: Todd Gardiner <todd.gardiner_at_4JoRJQOouAmoyOZbt-Xg-eIGc7cdL7FKktOqbhfZvYKOgCFTnieBebSIa2YEik>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 16:50:21 -0700


Motion seconded (even though I'm sure that's not needed).

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Roderick and Ellen Robertson < rjremr_at_eFtp-Rff8U97OY44s9gqpa92k15Z6IvK2KMpyUw0MkDGMNbflCJnQIwjxqk_raZSPHGD3DPwq8zcMp1Q8Q.yahoo.invalid> wrote:

> >>So we can argue quite a bit about what's legal. But clutching a
> copyright
> >>into the grave and beyond is a sure way to kill something that might yet
> >>have life in it.
>
> Note - this is *not* the place to argue the legality or morality of
> copyrights or copyright law. If you want to do that, there are plenty of
> other fora to do so.
>
> Having seen plenty of online communities come to pieces of this particular
> problem, I'd much rather it didn't happen here.
>
> RR
> He was born with the gift of laughter and the sense that the world was mad
> R. Sabatini, Scaramouche
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]            

Powered by hypermail