And then your property (if you have any) is held by the "victim" of your crime. Should they be able to make it grow, that is their reward/recompensation for the crime. All else is turned over to the new adult. This is fair and just.
In the case of murder, that person that persecutes the accused successfully, holds the property. That is societies way of finding justice for the murdered.
Problems
Households are historically one of two states:
One person owns all the property, and to some degree the other people in
that household are also their "property".
Household and the good of the house are joint property, owned either by the
family, bloodline or clan.
(There are a few states between these ranges, but these generalizations are
pretty common).
There is room for a third state, which is uncommon: Each person owns what
they own; there is no joint property.
Difficult for homes and businesses that people share. But functional outside
that, and certainly useful in a society that tracks perpetual property
ownership by a life-flame through many lives.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Powered by hypermail