> I'm firmly in the camp that any over-detailed knowlege of Arkat and his
> history is "unrealistic" in a post first age glorantha, and Dangerous even
> (especially?) in a game where he actually appears.
/// "un-realistic" is a concept I find, well, completely irrelevant in our
discussions about gloranthan topics ! If we wanted realism we wouldn't role play
any way. If you mean "un-characteristic" of the muddled history of the first
age, then I agree.
As for dangerous, that's what makes it so darn interesting !
Seriously, if our motto is "Arkat knowlege stays hidden", fine with me. Would have loved to know more about him/it tho.
Powered by hypermail