Re: Missing the Jonstown Compedium

From: Nick Eden <nick_at_VxkE5xS4rRnSTZcW-Eh7ahdHefmn_aoD54D7CrqKEvgZlP_nDw95Rmtln2UzUMU3wFpTLx0>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 07:04:32 +0100


I am not convinced that any of the main Gloranthan sources can be considered 'objective truth'. It certainly always worries me when I read people asserting that the book of Heortling history prooves such and such about God Learner or Uz and so on. What the Heortlings think, sure, but they're unlikely to be exactly right.

On Saturday, October 16, 2010, <hcarteau_at_GZBO-UmIuFp7RlY5k75L2tQW9PmGge8Wsf9ae6i1RHuLbG589nKKe1VSC8X5rhQMVe6aTk6-QQ.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
> Selon Greg Stafford <glorantha1_at_MxOzaQH6htf5d3OyYnJEPd_F8tyZT1nTtiKWY2HJqr6_N2vnOUGfQ1tUdfQy3AqSF9Jsfnm0RVAPZA.yahoo.invalid>:
>
>> Remember, these are facts collected from various places, and will need to
>> have a source too, even if it is "overheard in market from Arolanit
>> merchant."
> /// How comforting to read that even in Glorantha, an information has only value
> if you know its source. So each snipet will have to quote his !
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
           

Powered by hypermail