> I am not convinced that any of the main Gloranthan sources can be
> considered 'objective truth'. It certainly always worries me when I
> read people asserting that the book of Heortling history prooves such
> and such about God Learner or Uz and so on.
/// Agreed. Which is why it's so important to know about any information's
source. If you do, you can immediately correlate it and the source's interests
or biais, and assess it in a more accurate light.
Besides, if there's one thing I learned in Glorantha, it's that there is no
reality. There are only perceptions. I thought about Peter M.'s ideas of
"Noumène", read some about this and I don't think it applies either to Glorantha
or RW. Things exist only because we percieve them ; they have no intrisic nature
by themselves. (boy that that look heavy once it's out !)
> What the Heortlings think, sure, but they're unlikely to be exactly right.
Powered by hypermail