Selon julianlord <julian.lord_at_nVu0fNKeMmeAWliWaIhCoO2x-A2UxIQTin1vgzXhG5Qe_ZoXXvVRsPvu8PZyoH6LD1lML33I5d_v1_k.yahoo.invalid>:
> Mostali have two alphabets -- the ancient octadic one can be rendered using
> numbers 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ; whilst moving into Historic times, they use an
> extended alphabet 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9, the extra characters providing more
> accurate representation of non-mostali realities, necessary for the pragmatic
> representation of the ongoing corrective requirements.
>
> Mostali also use the point character "." for punctuation purposes, and words
> are rationally organised into bits of information from 1 to 10 characters
> long depending on the level of information required to vehicle each specific
> concept.
>
> Phonetic noises for the representation of these infograms have been developed
> for purely practical purposes, echoing the vocalic nature of the Primes and
> the consonantic nature of the other numbers, and are used day to day ; even
> though the risk exists that these noises can falsely be held to contain
> meanings in and of themselves, rather than being the arbitrarily designated
> codes intended in and required of the original design. The correct manner of
> understanding such phonetic noises is as locally implemented security code.
> No means to overcome this technical limitation have so far been discovered.
>
> It is recommended that those units lacking the minimal technical
> specifications for processing decadic code should be allocated to shifts
> describable using octadic instructions.
>
> Foremen are reminded that all functionally active monoRunic Ancient Units
> have been either upgraded to include the most current version of clayware
> I/O, or permanently decommissioned, or integrated into some functionally
> required octadic/decadic interface work units ; in all cases to provide for
> optimal task completion conditions ; but that some individual unrepaired
> Units may exist in the field, whose instructions may be either garbled or
> damageable. Extreme caution is to be exercised upon encountering such Units,
> due to the very technical limitations of their basic cybernetics, not
> upgraded to currently accurate functional cognitive representation of
> empirical conditions.
>
> Octadic code is compatible with decadic, but retro-compatibility is only
> partially assured -- Foremen and specialist Units should always remain aware
> that verbose instructions are desirable for compatibility purposes, to
> determine functionality or brokenness of older Units operating older versions
> of the clayware, or having no clayware installed.
>
> Communications with non-Mostali chaos-minds have been proven conclusively in
> 010.32.364878.154.3459733.4526 to be _fundamentally_ incompatible with even
> Ancient Binary, therefore Units are expressly instructed to disengage all
> interface systems except for tertiary ludic mode. It has been extensively
> determined in the paper that cessation of all interface functions is
> materially counterproductive, whereas some forms of non-deterministically
> constructed I/O schemes have successfully increased average test subjects'
> survivability ratio excommunicatio by 3.72%.
>
> It has been demonstrated in 010.32.189658.1566.185165.66618.254 that some
> monoRunic Units can simply fail to acknowledge decadic code, even when
> expressed within octadic limitations, but Foremen are assured that this
> purely technical issue will be resolved in due course by the currently
> functional quicksilver units.
>
> Do not be alarmed.
>
> Supreme Unit is watching you.
>
> Julian Lord
>
>
Powered by hypermail