Re: Unmanageable healers

From: Trotsky <TTrotsky_at_DDSUEUIzhAtUrTcVxCEOVwJER-KHsn-IwYmwDtT3vEBD0Ybc9wbZGrpyt5csW8r1Aje>
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:41:08 +0000


ryancaveney_at_rtfzz8xQTVDqgFhmvVMva8dhymfzc7ghpDGSI6h_qLPF6BwCH8iIyYCpmgKSKwMg6ilFFMfLP8H6MDA.yahoo.invalid wrote:
>
>
>
> > the wizards and sorcerors might see Chalana Arroy as a pagan's
> > superstitious misunderstanding of this ultimate source of healing
>
> Actually, sufficiently materialistic sorcerer-healers should have
> worked out the
> importance of harsh disinfectants, if not quite all of germ theory,
> which will
> tell them that Death is as good a healing rune as Life, perhaps even
> better!
> Cleansing a wound is all about Separation: kill the invaders but not the
> host, cut the dead tissue off from the still living and discard it,
> and prevent
> any growth except that which restores what was originally there.
>

I don't think that's a general truth, although there may be some healing cult somewhere in the West that believes this.The key issue is that the germ theory isn't actually true in Glorantha - disease really is caused by evil spirits, and they aren't really "alive" in the same sense as corporeal beings are (or bacteria, in our world). Certainly, one can separate the disease spirit from its host, and that's a form of Death, but I don't think its key to the way that most sorcerer-healers would work, just some of them.
-- 
Trotsky
Gamer and Skeptic

------------------------------------------------------
Trotsky's RPG website: http://www.ttrotsky.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
Not a Dead Communist: http://jrevell.blogspot.com/



           

Powered by hypermail