Re: mer-men

From: Andrew Larsen <aelarsen_at_9rrEP20EsKYtgivkEM_y8y_tNWzTT9vqYWsWvquFH_G9Y6iwnZvpKg9lbB8BvP6zW_Y>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:56:35 -0500


I'm sure that most sailors were
perfectly familiar in sex in which there were no women. Hmm...Diros and
Dormal....

Andrew E. Larsen

On Sep 30, 2011, at 9:18 AM, donald_at_j5Sgc-nzHJBGGZsHQBFB2Pglw6YhrbfC3iwDfIijLOSv3KNPigUhDxy7xrenOseuPdn0OmRodjJRh9Wg3CnqBg.yahoo.invalid wrote:

> >jorganos
> > Andrew Larsen <aelarsen_at_...> wrote:
> >
> > > Traditionally, there needs to be a woman involved.
> >
> > In the case of merfolk, this might change during the act, if you're unlucky...
>
> Which puts a whole new slant on mermaids luring sailors to their doom.
>
> If merfolk choose who is to carry the baby as part of their mating rituals they are going to be
> as confused as the humans about what's gone wrong. It could also explain why there as so
> few successful human/merfolk matings.
>
> --
> Donald Oddy
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]            

Powered by hypermail