>
> I'm not sure the Xeotam Dialogues are henotheist. Note that the
> wizard makes it clear that one must learn to compel the gods, not
> serve them. Only the Invisible God (not mentioned) is worthy of
> worship. That's pretty orthodox Malkionism. The Rokari versions of
> the Dialogues often have even sterner warnings against serving the
> gods (and a few diversions about the Invisible God), but that's about
> it.
>
> Jeff
Interesting. So the Rokari compel a storm god to bring the rain with their mastery of impersonal magic, rather than directly creating rain using a spell? Or is that just this brand of sorcery?
Nick