Re: Ompalam

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: !!!!!!> Visit the Search Engine of Lhankor Mhy <!!!!!!

From: Phil Hibbs <snarks_at_3jzWPkF3N-H_qlPbOm_sGxeJsw0OzHZtdg_Swxsj4rTJ78QuH1V6H9pTx_nwRuamIWQrD>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:48:40 +0100

Peter Metcalfe:
>If he was chaotic, then the Uroxi would sense him, no?

Illumination traditionally prevents detection.

Phil.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Phil Hibbs: "Re: Ompalam and chaos"
Previous message: Trotsky: "Re: The same good ol' question : what is Chaos ?"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Metcalfe: "Ompalam"
Next in thread: hcarteau_at_5naKtap2tQvZhz0nFLxQCQw8ThwtM7iYaIqSo9tuvOvi7RuidU8hoIkyrOds-60E1Ue: "Re: Ompalam"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: !!!!!!> Visit the Search Engine of Lhankor Mhy <!!!!!!

Powered by hypermail