Re: Venn Diagram - Magic <> Culture

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Other mail archives: !!!!!!> Visit the Search Engine of Lhankor Mhy <!!!!!!

From: Kevin McDonald <kpmcdona_at_UBeyqdZ7n8H4TdfVgjWinDuflUnmYukqjM7Ftf_XYsX2XjgnFZyAWTmbmhLzGXHPeRy>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:27:24 -0400

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Peter Metcalfe <metcalph_at_Nayp154BO6Px9etLCImYxUlna1hYQ6H2bDEI9OwqEtKRhfeGI4yXFQ4FEXz74wMg7qif_Imz1C-u4hx-Ig_Psg3EijjNZw.yahoo.invalid
> wrote:

> **
> On 10/13/2012 8:39 AM, Kevin McDonald wrote:
> > That Glamours appear/function like the
> > other forms of magic is a limitation of the magician - not the magic.
> >
> I would say that it's a limitation placed by the Cosmos.
>

How so? My interpretation is that a Lunar magician's glamours take the form of sorcery etc because that is all that the limited mind of the magician can grasp until fully enlightened. I assume you have another take on it. Why should the Cosmos dictate the manifestations of something that is by nature a kind of refutation of the Cosmos itself - or possibly that the Cosmos is itself a massive long-lasting Glamour.

-Kevin McD

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]